Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33376 (PNJ)

SURJIT SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/6803/2023 · 2025-01-28

Lapita Banerji

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-6803-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Surjit Singh State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the of hearing was given to the writ petitioner while passing the impugned order dated March 31, 2022 (Annexure P have been remanded back to the Assistant Registrar fresh hearing. 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State-respondents No.1 to 4 and submits that an opportunity of hearing was given to the parties and a fresh order had also been passed o October 15, 2024. He hands over a copy of the order in Court today, which is retained with the record. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 5. In view of the fact that grievance of the writ petitioner has been redressed 2023 Sr. No.106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision : Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no opportunity of hearing was given to the writ petitioner while passing the impugned order dated March 31, 2022 (Annexure P-6). He submits that matter should have been remanded back to the Assistant Registrar esh hearing. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf respondents No.1 to 4 and submits that an opportunity of hearing was given to the parties and a fresh order had also been passed o October 15, 2024. He hands over a copy of the order in Court today, which is retained with the record. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. In view of the fact that grievance of the writ petitioner has n redressed, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6803-2023 Date of Decision : 28.01.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. petitioner submits that no opportunity of hearing was given to the writ petitioner while passing the impugned 6). He submits that matter should have been remanded back to the Assistant Registrar-respondent No.4 for Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf respondents No.1 to 4 and submits that an opportunity of hearing was given to the parties and a fresh order had also been passed on October 15, 2024. He hands over a copy of the order in Court today, which Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the In view of the fact that grievance of the writ petitioner has disposed of as infructuous. VANDANA 2025.01.29 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6803-2023 6. Liberty to apply. 7. Connected application(s), if any, January 28, 202 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 2023 Liberty to apply. Connected application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No shall also stand disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.01.29 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document