CRWP-2458 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Geeta and another State of Haryana and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) CRM-W-499 record. CRWP-2458 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to re of the petitioner nos.5 to 14 and also to decide his representation dated 0 P-3). 2. in possession of the land measuring 46 Kanals 16 Marlas, comprised in Killa Nos.32/6 (8-0), 7(8 in the revenue estate of village Sersa, Tehsil Rai, District Sonep that various civil suits are already pending between the parties regarding this land, however, no interim injunction has been granted in favour of any of the 2458-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Geeta and another Versus Haryana and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 499-2025 Application is allowed, as prayed for. The documents marked as Annexures A 2458-2025 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 4 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners who are apprehending danger at the behest of respondent and also to decide his representation dated 0 Learned counsel for the petitioner in possession of the land measuring 46 Kanals 16 Marlas, comprised in Killa 0), 7(8-0), 15 (8-0), 33/10 (7-12), 11 (7 in the revenue estate of village Sersa, Tehsil Rai, District Sonep that various civil suits are already pending between the parties regarding this land, however, no interim injunction has been granted in favour of any of the - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2458-2025 (O&M) Decided on:07.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, Application is allowed, as prayed for. The documents marked as Annexures A-1 to A-3 are taken on The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for to 4 for protection of life and liberty apprehending danger at the behest of respondent and also to decide his representation dated 02.03.2025 (Annexure Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in possession of the land measuring 46 Kanals 16 Marlas, comprised in Killa 12), 11 (7-12) and 25 (7-12), situated in the revenue estate of village Sersa, Tehsil Rai, District Sonepat. He submits that various civil suits are already pending between the parties regarding this land, however, no interim injunction has been granted in favour of any of the (O&M) ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for to 4 for protection of life and liberty apprehending danger at the behest of respondent .03.2025 (Annexure are in possession of the land measuring 46 Kanals 16 Marlas, comprised in Killa 12), situated at. He submits that various civil suits are already pending between the parties regarding this VINOD KUMAR land, however, no interim injunction has been granted in favour of any of the 2025.05.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2458 parties and due to this fact, the private respondents have no right to take forcible possession of the same but the petitioners are time and again being attacked by the private respondents with the intention to take possession of the land in dispute prayer in the present petition lives and liberty. representation dated has been done till date. 3. 4. the respondent 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petiti direction to respondent no.2 Sonepat, to decide the representation (Annexure P accordance with law, liberty is perceiv 6. opinion qua ownership and possession of the land in dispute and would also not grant immunity any, committed by May 07, 2025 vinod* 2458-2025 (O&M) parties and due to this fact, the private respondents have no right to take le possession of the same but the petitioners are time and again being attacked by the private respondents with the intention to take possession of the land in dispute. He submits that the petitioner prayer in the present petition only to the extent of granting protection to their and liberty. It is submitted that the petitioner representation dated 02.03.2025 (Annexure P has been done till date. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petiti direction to respondent no.2-Commissioner of Police, Sonepat, District , to decide the representation (Annexure P accordance with law, and grant them protection, if any threat to liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be opinion qua ownership and possession of the land in dispute and would also not grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - parties and due to this fact, the private respondents have no right to take le possession of the same but the petitioners are time and again being attacked by the private respondents with the intention to take forcible . He submits that the petitioners confine their only to the extent of granting protection to their It is submitted that the petitioners have submitted a .03.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 but nothing e official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Commissioner of Police, Sonepat, District , to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners, in protection, if any threat to their lives and It is clarified that this order shall not be deemed to have any opinion qua ownership and possession of the land in dispute and would also from legal action for violation of law, if (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES parties and due to this fact, the private respondents have no right to take le possession of the same but the petitioners are time and again being forcible their only to the extent of granting protection to their submitted a ) to respondent no.2 but nothing Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary on with a Commissioner of Police, Sonepat, District s, in and deemed to have any opinion qua ownership and possession of the land in dispute and would also from legal action for violation of law, if VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document