Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WP (AT) NO: 2019 OF 2021 Between:
1. D. Babu rao, S/o Late D.Guravaiah, aged 26 years, Occ. Unemployed C/o H.N0.3-173A, G.G. Colony, Dornala village and Mandal(P.O) Prakasam District. 2. D.Vajramma, W/o Late D.Guravaiah, aged about 51 years. House wife r/o C/o H.N0.3-173A, G.G.Colony Doranala Village and Mandal(PO), Prakasam District. 3. Dugge Venkatamma, D/o Late D.Guravaiah, aged 33 years, R/o.Door N0.3-173A, Girijana Store Bazar, Dornala Village and Mandal(PO), Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by.its Principal Secretary Education Department, Secretariat, (Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District.)
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Praja Parishad, Kurnool Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Head Master, Zilla Parishad High School, srisailam devasthanam, Kurnool Dist. 4. Smt.S.Sarala Kumari, W/o Late D.Venkata Rao, Gajjalakonda Village, Markapur Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to declare the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing the proceeding vide RC.No.A9/32/2018 dt 28.03.2018 wherein not considering the 1st Applicant for the appointment on Compassionate Grounds is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of A.P.Civil Service(Appointment on Compassionate Grounds)Rules 1990, and consequently set aside the same directing the respondents to consider his name for the appointment on Compassionate grounds as per (Para2(l)of G.O.Ms.No.612, G.A.Services(A) Depart, dt
30.10.1991. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the applicants to file a single OA of all the applicants as they paid court fee of Rs.50/- each.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY DESAI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SERVICES III Counsel for the Respondents No.2,3: M/s B V APARNA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010501222021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Wednesday ,The Second Day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms Justice B S Bhanumathi Writ Petition Transfered From APAT No: 2019 of 2021 fO.A.No.1687 of 2018) Between: ...Petitioners D Babu Rao and others and ...Respondents The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the petitioners: I.Lakshmikanth Reddy Desai Counsel for the respondents:
1. Ramakrishna Akurathi 2.GP for Services III
3. B V Aparna Lakshmi The Court made the following Order: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“...to declare the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing RC.No.A9/32/2018 dated 28.03.2018 wherein not considering the 1®^ Applicant for the proceeding vide
2 W.P(AT) No.2019of202'l the appointment on Compassionate Grounds is illegal, arbitrary and Service(Appointment on Compassionate Grounds)Rules 1990, and consequently set aside the same directing the respondents to consider his name for the appointment on Compassionate grounds as per (Para2(l)of G.O.Ms.No.612, G.A.Services(A) Depart, dt 30.10.1991) and pass...”
2. No representation for the petitioner inspite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 26.03.2025,
learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had given NOC to the petitioner long back, however he would address a letter to the petitioner informing the next date of hearing and to make his own arrangements for appearance / hearing.
3. Sri.Kishore Kumar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the respondent No.4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-lll are present.
4. As such, the present writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand violation of A.P.Civil m closed.
Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY DESAI, Advocate [OPUC
2. TwoCCsto GP FOR SERVICES III, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to M/s. B.V. APARNA LAKSHMI, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Three C.D.Copies nm
HIGH COURT DATED:02/04/2025 (CC TODAY)
ORDER WP(AT).No.2019 of 2021 g 07 APR 2025 VSi. * Current election , ^ O' rr.
DISMISING THE WP(AT) FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS