[2025:RJ-JP:30652] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14778/2024 Mukesh S/o Kedarlal, R/o Nonera, Presently Byepass Road Itawa, District Kota (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota, District Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16033/2024 Dhanraj S/o Shri Nandkishore, R/o Fauji Doctor Ki Gali, Itawa, District Kota Rural, Kota (Rajasthan) (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Seth Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/08/2025 1. This instant applications for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Mukesh S/o Kedarlal,Dhanraj S/o Shri Nandkishore, in FIR No. 47/2024 dated 30.01.2024 registered at P.S. Itawa, District Kota whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 302 & 34 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:30652] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14778/2024] 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant(s)-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused, learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused 7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Mukesh S/o Kedarlal, Dhanraj S/o Shri Nandkishore, is hereby allowed and ordered to be [2025:RJ-JP:30652] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14778/2024] released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /50-51