- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2734 CRL.P No. 9932 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9932 OF 2024 BETWEEN: S. DHANANJAYA @ DHANU S/O. SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT TEACHERS COLONY, MULABAGAL TOWN, KOLAR - 563 131. PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KOTHAMANGALA VILLAGE, MULABAGAL TALUK, KOLAR - 563 131. (ACCUSED NO. 2 IN J.C.) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTHOSH KUMAR H.S., ADVOCATE (AB)) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MULABAGAL TOWN P.S., MULABAGAL, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VENKAT SATHYANARAYAN, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 (FILED U/S.483 BNNS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL IN CR.NO.80/2022 NOW IN SPL.C.C.NO.2857/2022 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 114, 116, 118, 212, 120-B, 302, 201 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC AND SEC.3(1)(I), 3(2), 3(4), 3(3) OF KARNATAKA CONTROL OF Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2734 CRL.P No. 9932 of 2024 ORGANIZED CRIMES ACT, MULABAGAL POLICE PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-1). THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. The petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.PC. Office has raised objections and the same are not complied with even though the matter is listed for 4th time. The order sheet dated 08.01.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. The petition is listed for the third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that there is neither any representation nor compliance of office objections. Finally, as a last chance, list this matter after one week. " - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2734 CRL.P No. 9932 of 2024 Inspite of that, there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6