Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33364 (KAR)

SRI V N MADAPPA v. SMT R INDRANI

RSA/332/2017 · 2025-03-22

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12224 RSA No. 332 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 332 OF 2017 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI V N MADAPPA S/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, RESIDING AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK MYSORE 570028 2. SRI M MAHADEVASWAMY S/O V N MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK MYSORE 570028 3. SRI CHANDRASHEKARASWAMY S/O V N MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK MYSORE 570028 Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12224 RSA No. 332 of 2017 4. SMT SUNDARAMMA W/O M B RAVINDRA KUMAR DAUGHTER OF V N MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.110, 8TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR B M HOSPITAL VINOBA ROAD MYSORE 570012 5. SMT PAVITHRA W/O PRAKASH @MAHADEVAPPA D/O V N MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING DEVIAHANAGUNDI VILLAGE SRIRAMPURA II STAGE, MYSORE 570023 6. SMT KOMALA W/O MAHADEVAPPA D/O V N MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT KURUGURU VILLAGE, T NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT 571124 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.B.B.SAGAR,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT R INDRANI D/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12224 RSA No. 332 of 2017 RESIDING AT NO.640, 1ST FLOOR, CHAMARAJ DOUBLE ROAD MYSORE 57002 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:31.08.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.308/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD:27.03.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.1005/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM., MYSORE THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating that the appellants intend to withdraw the appeal. The appellants have affixed their signature on the memo. 2. The memo is placed on record. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:12224 RSA No. 332 of 2017 3. The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of dismissal of the appeal, IA.No.1/2017 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, IA.No.1/2017 is disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25