APHC010499762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25722/2025 Between: 1. SIDDALAPURAM SUBRAMANYAM, S/O, S.NARAYANA, AGE 53 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O. D.NO.3/199/8, NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHY, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, A.P 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, RAMIGIRI CIRCLE, CHENNEKOTHAPALLIPOLICE VSTATION CK,PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, CHENNEKOTHAPALLI POLICE STATION, CK.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. CHAKALA AGRAHARAM ADINARAYANA, S/O. LATE MUTHYALAPPA, AGE 70 YEARS,OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, NEAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ANDHRA 2 PRADESH. 7. CHAKALA AGRAHARAM MANJUNATH, S/O CHAKALA AGRAHARAM ADINARAYANA, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, NEAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. CHAKALA AGRAHARAM RAMU, S/O CHAKALA AGRAHARAM ADINARAYANA, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, NEAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. CHAKALA AGRAHARAM SIVAIAH, S/O CHAKALA AGRAHARAM ADINARAYANA AGE 35 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, NEAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 10. CHAKALA AGRAHARAM PAKKEERAMMA, W/O. LATE CHAKALA AGRAHARAM ESWARAIAH, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NYAMADDALA VILLAGE, NEAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, C.K.PALLI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25722 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents especially Respondent No. 4 and 5 herein in calling the petitioner to the police station and forcing the petitioner to settle Civil Disputes and forcing petitioner to withdraw the pending suit vide O.S.No. 42 of 2025 on the file of Honble Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram and hand over the possession of the land to an extent of Ac. 1.28 cents in Sy. No. 403 - 3B and Ac. 3.22 cents in Sy.No. 403 - 5B, Total extent Ac. 4.50 cents, situated in Nyamaddala village, C.K.Palli Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District to the unofficial respondents herein and to act as per the terms of unofficial respondent as being arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice, apart from various judicial pronouncements of this Honble Court as well as the Honble Apex Court and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 and 5 herein not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in Civil Disputes pending between petitioner and the unofficial respondents and to pass….” 2. Heard Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against him and forcing the petitioner to settle civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 4 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions would submit that the respondent police never called the petitioner to the police station and never forced the petitioner to settle civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in absence of any crime registered against him. The police are further directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties by calling the petitioner to the police station and pressuring him to settle the pending civil suit. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25722 of 2025 Dated.19.09.2025 UPS 553