HEMANT SINGH ALIAS HIMANSHU AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
CRM-M/13816/2025 · 2025-04-05
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33360 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33360 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.13816 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.04.2025 Hemant Singh @ Himanshu and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Umesh Pandey, Advocate and Mr. M.M. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.0013 dated 26.02.2025 under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 191(2), 190 of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Naya Gaon, District SAS Nagar (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). Learned State counsel, at the very outset, submits that one of the injured witness has not been impleaded as a respondent, whose consent is necessary for adjudication of the present controversy. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh petition after impleading the other injured witness as a respondent. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR)
JUDGE 05.04.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.04.05 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh