Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20773-DB CCC No.2482/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2482/2018 BETWEEN:
SMT CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE UJJANIGOWDA, SINCE DEAD BY LRS
1. CHIKKAKEMPEGOWDA
S/O LATE UJJANIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
2. NAGARAJU
S/O LATE UJJANIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
3. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE UJJANIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
4.
SMT. RAJALAKSHMI
D/O LATE UJJANIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
5. BHAGAWAN
S/O LATE UJJANIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT KAMAGERE VILLAGE KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571313 …COMPLAINANTS
(BY SRI. S. ANIL KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20773-DB CCC No.2482/2018
AND:
1.
SRI SURESH KUMAR THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB MYSURU CIRCLE K.R.S. ROAD MYSURU-570001.
2.
SRI SHIVASHANKAR SECRETARY KIADB CENTRAL OFFICE, KHANIJA BHAVAN 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING NO.49, RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU-560001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. B B PATIL FOR A1 & A2., ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN BY TAKING SUITABLE ACTION TO PUNISH THEM FOR WILFUL DIS- OBEDIENCE OF THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 31.07.2018 MADE IN WRIT APPEAL NO.2694/2015 (LA-KIADB) BY CONFIRMING THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.276/2014 (LA-KIADB) DATED 05.08.2015.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)
No representation for the complainant. Learned counsel for accused Nos.1 and 2 submits that the order is complied and compliance report is filed on 11.04.2023.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20773-DB CCC No.2482/2018
2. The records show that consistently learned counsel for the complainant is not appearing before the Court. He has not even filed counter to the compliance affidavit denying the same.
3. Therefore, reserving liberty to the complainants to revive the complaint, if there is any non-compliance, these proceedings are closed.
Sd/- (K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE
Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE
AKC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35