Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33348 (RAJ)

PUSHPA BAI AND ANR v. RAMCHARAN MANDOVERA

CSA/608/2017 · 2025-05-19

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 608/2017 1. Pushpa Bai W/o Mr. Chhotulal Meghwal., R/o Balkasa, Tehsil Keshoraipatan, District Boondi Raj. 2. Ram Dayal S/o Mr. Chhotulal Meghwal, R/o Balkasa, Tehsil Keshoraipatan, District Boondi Raj. ----Appellants Versus Ramcharan Mandovera S/o Ganesh Lal, R/o Luhar Gali, Boondi, District Boondi Raj. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Raunak Singhvi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 19/05/2025 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that during pendency of the present appeal, parties have settled their disputes and the respondent has received settlement amount from the appellants, therefore, the present second appeal has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not aware about such settlement, but he submits that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the appellant may be granted liberty to move revival application, if cause of action or grievance still survives. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA RANI -67