TIRUMALA NAIDU BADANA v. THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
WP/25503/2025 · 2025-09-17
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33348 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33348 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010499392025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 25503 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-29 [3446]
Tirumala Naidu Badana ...Petitioner Vs. The Debts Recovery Tribunal and another ...Respondents
**********
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Mangena Sree Rama Rao Advocate for Respondents : ---
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 18th September, 2025 P C :
The petitioner states that he had already approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, by way of SA.No.387 of 2025 along with IA.No.2671 of 2025 in which no orders have been passed and that in the meantime, the petitioner is being sought to be dispossessed by resorting to the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, which would render the proceedings before the D.R.T academic.
2 HCJ & RRR, J WP_25503_2025
The Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the D.R.T to pass appropriate orders in IA.No.2671 of 2025 in SA.No.387 of 2025 preferably within two months. In the meantime, status quo shall be maintained with regard to the possession of the petitioner.
We, however, make it clear that in case the D.R.T finds that the petitioner is in any manner trying to delay the consideration of the IA or for that matter disposal of the S.A, it would be open to the Tribunal to pass appropriate orders in that regard. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Vjl