Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33344 (AP)

SRI VEMULA RAMULU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/25623/2024 · 2025-01-06

R Raghunandan Rao, Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT o i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25623 OF 2024 Between: 1. SRI VEMULA RAMULU, S/o Late Vemula Kotaiah, aged about 63 No avocation, R/o Door No. Ibrahimpatnam, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh Years, 10-110, Ring Centre, PIN - 521456. WIFE OF DETENU- SMT. VEMULA RAMANA W/o Vemula Ramulu, aged about 53 Years, Homemaker, R/o Door No. 10-110, Ring Centre, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh, PIN - 521456. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Room No-185, Ground Floor, Building No-2 Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi - 522238, Andhra Pradesh. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Mangalagiri - 522502, Andhra Pradesh. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR -CUM- DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PALNADU DISTRICT, Arundelpet, Narasaraopeta, Lingamguntia Agraharam Rural, Andhra Pradesh, PIN - 522601. A 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PAL^DU DISTRICT, Arundelpet, Narasaraopeta, Lingamguntia Agraharam Rural, Andhra Pradesh, PIN-522601. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Gurazala ^b- • Divisional Police Officer, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, -Gurazala Police Station, Gurazala, Andhra Pradesh, PIN - 522415. 2* 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER -CUM- INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Piduguralla Police Station, Tangeda Road, Piduguralla, Andhra Pradesh, PIN-522413. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or Writ or Direction one more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against Respondents for production of DETENU VEMULA RAMULU before this Hon'ble Court, and for his being set at liberty forthwith by declaring the action of Respondent No.6 as illegal, ultra vires and in violation to Article 21 of the Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents to expedite production of DETENU VEMULA RXmULU before liberty forthwith. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to RECEIVE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. PHANI BABU YALAMANCHILI Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following Order: this Hon'ble Court, and for his being set at APHC010499632024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) pa [3493] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25623/2024 Between: 'I ...PETITIONER Sri Vemula Ramulu AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PHANI BABU YALAMANCHILI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The present Writ Petition has been filed for illegal detention of the husband of the petitioner. The stand of the respondents is that the detenue had not been detained or arrested but was only served a notice, under Section 35 (3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in relation to the complaint filed against him by the wife of his deceased son. 2. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue has 3. now been released. In the circumstances, this Writ Petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner or the detenue to avail of their remedies in accordance with the law. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand Sd/- Nl PRABHAKAR RAO assistant REGISTR^ FFICER closed. 1 //true copy// / SE YALAMANCHILI Advocate [OPUC] general Advocate [OPUC] To, CC to Sri. PHANI BABU Sri. THE ADVOCATE 1. One 2. One CC to 3 Three CD Copies. LA Writ NS Sec HIGH COURT ’ DATED: 06/01/2025 ORDER Sf and»s^ X 0 5 2025 ^ . Current becuon WP.No.25623 of 2024 ml 09/. CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS