Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33337 (PNJ)

ANKIT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/15218/2025 · 2025-08-18

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CRM-M-15218-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 18.08.2025 Ankit and another . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. PK Jhanda, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioners, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of Petitioner(s) FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station District Ankit and Banty alias Mohit 674 07.11.2023 377 of IPC, 1860 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 [S. 511 of IPC, added later on] Bhiwani Sadar Bhiwani 2. At the outset, learned State counsel informs that present petition has been rendered infructuous, on account of the final decision of the trial, wherein, petitioners have already been convicted, therefore, same may be disposed of accordingly. 3. In view of the statement of learned State counsel, present petition is ordered to have been dismissed, same having been rendered infructuous. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE August 18, 2025 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2025.08.18 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document