Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33336 (HP)

PARWATI DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/19270/2025 · 2025-12-09

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19270 of 2025 Decided on: 09.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parwati Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.T.R.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. T.R.Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner claims to be legally wedded wife of late Sh. Chhote Lal. According to the petitioner, her 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 husband was engaged as Beldar in the year 1998. His services were regularised on 30.12.2016 and he died in harness on 10.03.2019, after rendering about two years of regular service. Petitioner stakes her claim upon family pension and feels aggrieved against denial of the same by the respondents. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 9, 2025 Judge R.Atal