IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 215 of 2025 Decided on 07.10.2025 Rukhsana ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting. No. For the petitioner : Ms. Vandana, Advocate, vice Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent No.1/State. Ms. Narvada, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 9. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral) Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that the parties were informed about their presence, however, they are not appearing before the Court. Since the present petition has been filed for quashing the F.I.R alongwith consequential proceedings based on the compromise, but the parties are not appearing to affirm the compromise, hence, the present petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 07th October, 2025 (ravinder).