AMAR DEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8885/2025 · 2025-05-16
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33330 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33330 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82190-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8885 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Deep Singh And Another Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramendra Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anurag Yadav,C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra,Sanjay Kumar Om Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The following prayer has been made in the writ petition:
"(a) issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of madamus commanding the respondents and their Subordinates etc. to pay to the petitioners amount of compensation award dated 07.07.2023 (Annexure No. VI to the writ petition) payable to the petitioners on such terms and conditions as contained in the
judgment dated 19.11.2024 of this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No. 35010 of 2024, Raman Phutela and others Vs. Union of India and others, or on such terms and conditions deemed by this Hon'ble Court to be necessary under fact and circumstances of the case."
2. The petitioners are claiming right to receive compensation in respect of some area of Plot No. 211, which they have admittedly purchased after issuance of notification under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956. This fact has also been stated by the Competent Authority in the written instructions submitted by him.
3. Sri Mahendra Pratap has placed on record the instructions received from the Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, in which it is stated that the entire compensation amount in terms of the award is in deposit with the Competent Authority. The National Highways Authority of India has challenged the award before the Arbitrator in terms of Section 3G(5) of the Act and the said proceedings are pending. It is further stated that the
compensation amount would be released in favour of the person entitled to the same subject to furnishing of undertaking by the land owner.
4. Sri Ramendra Asthana, having regard to the aforesaid stand, prays for the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation along with no objection from the vendor so that their claim is considered.
5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with aforesaid liberty to the petitioners.
6. The order has been passed in presence of Sri Sanjay Kumar Om,
learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 17.5.2025 gp Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad