Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3333 (GAU)

Taw Dulom v. The State of AP and 7 Ors

WP(C)/22/2025 · 2026-05-25

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040000682025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/22/2025 Taw Dulom Son of Taring Dulom, permanent resident of Daporijo, PO and PS Daporijo, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Ors through the Commissioner, Education, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Commissioner Education Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Secretary Education Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The State Project Director Age: 0 Occupation : Samagra Shiksha / ISSE Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 5:The Deputy State Project Director Age: 0 Occupation : Samagra Shiksha/ ISSE Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Page No.# 2/3 791111 6:The District Project Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Samagra Shiksha/ ISSE Upper Subansiri District Daporijo. 7:Tamchi Taniang Age: 0 Occupation : DPC O/o the DDSE Raga Kamle District 791120 8:Nyato Dukum Age: 0 Occupation : Honorable Minister (Commerce and Industries Labour IPR etc) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Gimi Tarak, Byabang Mema,Taja Garam Advocate for the Respondent : Taba Tagum, Tadu Tamin,Tsering Nyima,Nabam Kakum,Abhai Kumar Singh,T Kumar,Pramod Kr. Gour,SC (Education) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 26.05.2026 Mr. K. Mena, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Garam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. T. Nyima, learned counsel for the respondent No.7, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on having been become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant