Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33326 (HP)

RAMESH CHAND SHARMA v. THE HPSEBL AND ANOTHER

CWP/20266/2025 · 2025-12-23

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20266 of 2025 Decided on: 23rd December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ramesh Chand Sharma …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Electricity Board Limited and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Nisha Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Ms. Nisha Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred representation dated 19.09.2024 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2 for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned vice counsel appearing for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 19.09.2024 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) December 23, 2025 Judge Mukesh