P.John Paul, S/o. P.Sudharshanam, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep: by its
WP/1249/2013 · 2025-08-12
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33322 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33322 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010499932013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 1249/2013 Between:
1. P.JOHN PAUL, S/O. P.SUDHARSHANAM,, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC:
ROAD ROLLER OPERATOR(RETD.,), R & B. DIVISION, TENALI, R/ O. H.NO.5-15-28, PALLEKONDA STREET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, SECRETARY, R& B DEPARTMENT, A.P., SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF ERRAMANZIL HYDERABAD, -
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R & B DIVISION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. SRI J JOHN ROLLER OPERATOR R B DIVISION TENALI GUNTUR, DISTRICT.
5. THE HONBLE ANDHRA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT, HYDERABAD, REP: BY ITS REGISTRAR.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one
in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI, call for the records relating to and in connection with the order dt: 24/01/2012 passed in OA.No.9758/2009 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Articles 14 & 16 of Constitution of India and relevant provisions of the A.P. Revised Pension Rules, 1980 and consequently quash the same and pass such other orders or
order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 1499 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for. hearing and dispose the writ petition and pass such other
order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case_ Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following:
At the time of considering the matter, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner is no more.
2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date:13.08.2025 Ksj