Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33320 (CHH)

SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KORBI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4331/2021 · 2025-07-21

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:34848 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4331 of 2021 Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Korbi Having Its Registration No. 993, Block And Tahsil Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. Through Its President Namely Manoj Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Govind Prasad Agrawal Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Dongri, Tahsil Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chhattisgarh State Co Operative Marketing Federation Limited (Markfed) Through Its Chairman Cum Director , 6th Floor, Tower C, Commercial Complex, Cbd, Sector 21, Block C Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Markfed officer Chhattisgarh State Co Operative Marketing Federation Limited (Markfed), Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Co Operative Central Bank Through Chief Executive officer, Nehru Chowk Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Nodal officer District Co Operative Central Bank, Branch Janjgir Champa , District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. …. Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.3 & 4 : Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate For Respondents No.5 : Ms. Seema Mishra, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- Order on Board 22.07.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim