Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33319 (AP)

K.Munaiah, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30650/2022 · 2025-07-24

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010500722022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 30650/2022 Between: 1. K.MUNAIAH, S/O.LATE.KESAPPA, OCC:AGRICULTURAL COOLIE, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O PAMIDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL TAHSILDHAR, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DIST. 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PAMIDI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 7. G SATISH KUMAR, S/O G.VENKATACHALAPATI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO.8-103, NEAR WATER TANK, PAMIDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 8. Y KARIM SAB, S/O ALLABAKASH, KOTA STREET, PAMIDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 9. IMAM MODIQ SAB, S/O LATE ALI SAB, 10. C A REHMAAQ, S/O ALISAB, 11. MAHABOBEE, W/O Y.KARIM SAB, 12. C ABDUL KHALEED, S/O Y.KARIM SAB, 13. C MAHBOOB BASHA, S/O Y.KARIM SAB, 14. C KHAJA MEHNUDDIN, S/O Y.KARIM SAB, 15. C JULEKHABEE, D/O Y.KARIM SAB, 16. C MUNNI, D/O Y.KARIM SAB, RESPONDENTS 9 TO 16 ARE R/O PAMIDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in registering the document vide document no. 26/1987 dated 08.01.1987 in favour of the 8th respondent for the land being an extent of Ac 1.00 cents in Sy.No.319/C situated at Pamidi revenue village and Mandal, Ananthapuram District and further document No. 692/2012 dated 13.04.2010 in favour of the 7th respondent for the land being an extent of Ac 1.00 in Sy No. 319/1C1 situated at Pamidi revenue village and mandal, Ananthapuram District is as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the AP Assigned lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 1977 and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to entertain any documents in respect of the agricultural lands being an extent of Ac 2.53 cents in Sy.No. 319/ 1C1 and extent of Ac 0.59 cents 319/ 1C3 situated at Pamidi Revenue village and Mandal, Ananthapuram District presented by the respondents 9 to 16, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. CHETLURU SREENIVAS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO. 30650 of 2022 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn by reserving liberty to the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date : 25.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Writ Petition No:30650 of 2022 Date : 25.07.2025 SPP