Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33314 (AP)

PANDRANKI RAMANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/25715/2025 · 2025-09-21

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010499182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 25715 of 2025 Between: 1. PANDRANKI RAMANA, S/O.LATE PYDANNA, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.6-64, SATHIVANIPALEM, JAGGAYYAPALEM POST, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. PEELA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.RAMA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-48/3/1, SANTHOSIMATHA COLONY, KOTA NARAVA, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. PEELA NIKHIL SAI, S/O.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-48/3/1, SANTHOSIMATHA COLONY, KOTA NARAVA, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT of MANDAMUS, or other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein in cancelling the Sale Deed document bearing No.4041 of 2025 dated 02-07-2025, Sale Deed document bearing No.4042 of 2025 dated 02-07-2025 and Rectification Deed 2 document bearing No.3870 of 2025 dated 01-07-2025 in respect of land situated in Sy.No.319/3 of Narava Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in spite of representation dated 19-08-2025 submitted by me as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, opposed to very spirit and object of Registration Act, 1908 and consequently to cancel the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri S.Bhargav Yadav, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner on record, sought leave of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition and he also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 22.09.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25715 of 2025 Date: 22.09.2025 siva