ANKEM VEERA SWAMI NAIDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/330/2025 · 2025-01-27
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3331 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3331 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\ i-`` ` lN THE HIGH COURT-OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl + MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 330 OF 2025 Between : Ankem Veera Swami Naidu, S/o Tata Rao Aged about 44 years, R/o FIat No. 501, Seshadri Nilayam, Housing Board Colony, Nallapadu Post, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Station House Officer, Prakash Nagar Police Station, Rajamahendravaram. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Amaravati. ...Respondent Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 & Section 438 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of ground sof Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Prakash Nagar Police Station Rajamahendravaram, to release the Petitioner/A-1 on Bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime in FIR No. 242/2024, registered at Prakash Nagar Police Station Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the
arguments of Sri V.R.Maheswara Rao Paleti, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent; .-lx:
ORDER: _ The Crim'lnal Petition iS filed On behalf of the petitioner/Al to grant anticipatory ban in connection With Crime No.242/2024 of Prakashnagar police station, East GodaVari District. 2) A case has been registered againStthe Pet-ltiOner and Others for the offence punishable u/see.143(1),144(2) r/w 3(5) B.N,S and Section 3(1), 4(1 ), 5(1 )(a) of Immoral TraffilC (Prevent-Ion) Act. 3) Caseofthe Prosecution in briefiSthat: on 29.12.2024 at about 5.00pm, near happy Street, Style colour beauty saloon and spa, RajamahendraVaram, On receipt Of Credible information about illegal organization of brothel house in the above said place, the station House Officer of Prakashnagar POliCe Station, RajamahendraVaram COnduCted ra-ld in the above Premises. On seeing police one person tr®led to escape. Then pol|lce apprehended him and On enqu'lry, he d'lsclosed h'ls identity particulars and stated that Al to A3 procured six ladies to do prostitution in the above said place. 4) Heard. PerusedthereCOrd. 5) Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is not completed and some more witnesses are yet to be examined. He ```--ts>=_ •* I--.=j>J
2 J/ submits that basI'ng On the statement of LWl that the petitioner has taken rooms on rent and the said racket js going on in the said premI'SeS, the subJ-eCt Crime is registered against the petitioner. 6) Learned counsel for the petitI-Oner Strenuously contended that there I'S absolutely no connectI-On between the victims and the petitI-Oner herein. Except the said statement of LW1, there is no materI-al tO connect the petitioner herein to the aforesaid crime. The petitioner Its working as a physical Director at an Engineering college in Guntur, whereas, the aforesaI'd inCI|dent Said to have taken place jn Rajamahendravaram. The petI'tiOner was not found at the place of the incl-dent. ln the facts and circumstances of the case, this court I-S I'nCIined to consider the prayer of anticl®patory bal-I to the petitioner. 7) Accordingly, in the event of arrest of petitioner/Al with regard to thI'S Crl'me, he shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for the ll-ke sum to the satl'sfaction of the arresting police officl'als and also on condjtjon that the petI®tiOner sha" make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or Promise tO the PrOSeCutI'On Witnesses. \_ iE
/I .
\_ iE
/I . J>~4¥ petI-tI-Oner sha" appear before the statIOn House officer concerned once ln a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 am and o5.00 pm, till filing of the charge-sheet. 8) AccordI'ngly, the crI-ml-nat Petjtjon I-S a"owed. /ITRUE COPY// For Sd/-A.. VENurusQPAL E€i`AO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR hiGIHEE±.E sEC"ON OFFICER To,
1. The Station House Officer, Prakash Nagar Police StatI®On, Rajamahendravaram. 2. One lCC to Srl'. V.R.Maheswara Rao Paleti, Advocate [opuc]
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT]
4. One spare copy MM
J/
HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :27/01 /2025
ORDER CRLP.No.330 of 2025 ALLOWED l® 4 F#LiB ?_I-}25 ¢r`,` FI. , I-, `' Al, l`. I.` ` `jwr f