[2025:RJ-JP:3289] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15269/2023 Siyaram S/o Polu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Meeno Ki Dhani, Kuredi, Police Station Peeplu, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Bittu S/o Ramlal, R/o Meeno Ki Dhani Kuredi, Police Station Peeplu, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 15354/2024 Siyaram S/o Polu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Meeno Ki Dhani, Kuredi, P.s. Peeplu, District Tonk (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Tonk Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 15564/2024 Damodar S/o Late Shri Bhura, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Kureri, P.s. Peeplu, District Tonk. (At Present Confined In Tonk Jail ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Tyagi through VC. Ms. Sushila Tyagi through VC. Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena through VC. Mr. Om Prakash Meena through VC. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Kaushik through VC. Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP through VC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Order [2025:RJ-JP:3289] (2 of 3) 23/01/2025 1. These Criminal Misc. Bail Applications have been brought under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.109/2023 registered with Police Station, Peeplu, District Tonk (Raj.) for offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302, 336, 452, 323 IPC. 2. Heard the parties. 3. It appears that previously bail to the petitioner Siyaram and co-accused Pappu was refused on 4.4.2024 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15269/2023 alongwith connected bail application. Subsequently, co-accused Pappu was granted bail on 28.11.2024 in S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No. 12993/2024. 4. According to FIR, several persons allegedly assaulted to the father of the informant causing injury at the head and other parts of the body as well. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no specific allegation as to who had caused the head injury to the deceased. Pappu was in custody since 9.4.2023. 5. Submission of the State at the time of grant of bail to Pappu was that two to three prosecution witnesses were yet to be examined. 6. As on today, trial has not concluded. Allegation against the petitioners are similar to Pappu. Petitioners are ready to co- operate with the trial. 7. Considering the period already undergone by the petitioners and grant of bail to co-accused, let the accused-petitioners above- named be released on bail in the aforesaid FIR, if they are not wanted in any other case, provided that they furnish bail bonds of [2025:RJ-JP:3289] (3 of 3) Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the following conditions:- (i) the petitioners shall fully co-operate with the trial, failing which, the trial judge would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. (ii) the petitioners shall not leave the Country without permission of the trial Court otherwise it would amount to disobedience of the order of this Court and would be a ground for cancellation of bail. (iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence. (iv) one of the surety shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the trial Court. 8. Accordingly, these instant bail applications stand allowed. (BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 2-4-sumer/-