Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14509/2024 Sonu S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Moujipura, Tan Lahsoda, Police Station Rawajana Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 07/01/2025
1. Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous bail application under Section 482 BNSS as he is having apprehension of his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No. 0107/2023, registered at Police Station Rawajana Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) for offences under Sections 166, 167, 192, 197, 198, 200, 207, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC.
2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Counsel further submits that co-accused Dinesh has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated
28.11.2024. Counsel further submits that in terms of order dated 02.12.2024 petitioner has already been joined investigation. Counsel further submits that alleged offences are triable by
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-14509/2024] Magistrate. He further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter. He thus, prays that instant bail application under Section 482 BNSS may kindly be allowed.
3. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, he fairly concedes that petitioner has joined the investigation.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and especially the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has joined the investigation, but without commenting on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.
6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Rawajana Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) in F.I.R. No. 0107/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-14509/2024]
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J ANAND TANWAR /48