Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
AD-03 Ct No.16 19.05.2025 TN
FAT 230 of 2021
Shrimati Sumati Pahari and others Vs. Umapada Pahari and others
Mr. Rabindranat Mahato, Mr. Aritra Shankar Ray ….for the appellants
Mr. Debasish Roy, Ld. Sr. Adv., Mr. Sukanta Das ….for the respondent nos.1 & 2
1. In the judgment dated May 14, 2025, the following corrections should be deemed to be incorporated:
(i) In paragraph no.18 of the same, in the first line, instead of the word “appellants”, it should be read as “respondent nos. 1 and 2”; (ii) In paragraph no.32 of the self-same judgment, within parenthesis, instead of
“defendant/appellant no.1”, it should be recorded as “defendant/respondent no.1”. (iii) In the seventh line of paragraph no. 46, instead of “D.W.1”, the expression should read as
“P.W.1”.
2. This order be deemed to be a part of the judgment dated May 14, 2025.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
(Uday Kumar, J.)