Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33297 (CHH)

SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT, KHAIJA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4251/2021 · 2025-07-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:36164 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4251 of 2021 Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Khaija Having Its Registration No. 714, Block And Tahsil Baloda, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) Through Its In-Charge Manager Namely Ratiram Pant S/o Late Aatma Ram Pant, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Khaija, Post Khaija, Tahsil Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited (Markfed) Through Its Chairman-Cum-Director, 6th Floor, Tower C, Commercial Complex, Cbd, Sector-21, Block C, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Markfed officer, Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited (Markfed), Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Co-Operative Central Bank, Through Chief Executive officer, Nehru Chowk, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 6 - Nodal officer, District Co-Operative Central Bank, Branch Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) -2- (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Kabeer Kalwani, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For State : Mr. Topi Lal Bareth, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.5 & 6 : Ms. Seema Mishra, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25.07.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM