APHC010498752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25577/2025 Between: 1. SMT. SUGUNA MUDDANA,, W/O LATE SURESH MUDDANA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC- HOME MAKER, R/O FLATNO.301,CALADIA, THE BOTANIKA JAYABHERI ENCLAVE, GACHIBOWLI, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA - 500 032. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT of MANDAMUS, to declare the action of the 3rd Respondent in issuing the notice to the Petitioner herein in O.P. No.23 of 2025 on the file of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chirala, Prakasham District as illegal, arbitrary, against law and against the principals of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in respect of O.P. No. 23 of 2025 on the file of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chirala, Prakasam District who is the 3"^^ Respondent herein pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C S N RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25577 of 2025 ORDER:- Learned counsel for petitioner appeared virtually and after arguing for some time, sought leave of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition, addressing that he will pursue O.P.No.23 of 2025 before the Tribunal for Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens. Sri Gopala Raju, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for petitioner on record endorsed the same. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for petitioner urged this Court to dispense with the presence before the authority pending adjudication. 5. Considering the request, petitioner is permitted to file appropriate application before the authority under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. Thereafter, the authority is directed to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law on the said application for their dispense with before the authority. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.09.2025 KBN