- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18633 RFA No. 1906 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1906 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. SARASWATHAMMA D/O LATE RAMAIAH, W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.779, VENKATASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, DOMLUR HUTTING COLONY, 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARAYAN.M., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. CHANNAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, 2. SMT. R.LAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 3. SMT. GOWRAMMA D/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SL.NO. 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO.55/2, 4TH CROSS, DOMLUR, BANGALORE-560 071. 4. SRI. R.CHANDRA S/O LATE RAMAIAH, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18633 RFA No. 1906 of 2017 R/AT NO.14, MOORE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAVAN KUMAR.G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.D.KRISHNAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 4) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Pavan Kumar.G., counsel on behalf of Sri.M.D.Krishnappa., for respondents 1 to 4 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 02.06.2025. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 03.06.2025. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18633 RFA No. 1906 of 2017 The appeal is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of June 2025. The appeal is pending from eight years. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69