Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33292 (CHH)

NIRMALA BAI v. SITARAM

WP227/517/2020 · 2025-02-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7494 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 517 of 2020 1 - Nirmala Bai W/o Bisauha Lodhi Aged About 47 Years Occupation Labour, R/o Village Kamta, Post Office, Murta, Tahsil And P. S. Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Sitaram S/o Dauram Lodhi Aged About 55 Years Occupation Service-Clerk, At Communtiy Health Centre, Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 2 - Shriram S/o Dauram Lodhi Aged About 48 Years Occupation Cultivator, R/o Village Godhi Khurd, Tahsil And P. S. Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 3 - Bhuneshwar S/o Shriram Lodhi Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Godhi Khurd, Tahsil And P. S. Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 4 - Dauram S/o Late Shri Dhanpat Lodhi Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Godhi Khurd, Tahsil And P. S. Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Sunil Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Prateek Tiwari, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 12.02.2025 Digitally signed by SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi