IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 1593 of 2025 Decided on: 14.07.2026 Sh. Shiv Lal …Petitioner. Versus The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation … Respondent. …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate. For the respondent. : Ms. Suchita Kaintura, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the entire retiral benefits except the revised arrears on account of revision of pay-scale. He further submits that, at this juncture, he does not press the present petition. However, since the respondent-Corporation has filed a review petition with respect to the revised pay-scale, the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 petitioner prays that he may be granted liberty to agitate the matter, after the decision rendered in the review petition. 2. In view of the said prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant execution petition is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty, as prayed for. 3 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Jiya Lal Bhardwaj) Judge 14th July, 2026 (Guleria)