#- APHC010498532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0*0 v 0 WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8110 OF 2024 Between: Talasu Nageswara Rao, S/o late Dasaratha Rao, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Sai Colony, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District. ...Petitioner/Accused AND of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, 1. State Amaravathi. 2. Bellala Venkata Ramana, S/o.late Dharmaraju, Aged about 58 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Gowathm school street, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C.No.659/2022 on the file of Judicial First Court at Palasa, Srikakulam District, as against the Class Magistrate Petitioner/Accused. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.659/2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court at Palasa, against the Petitioner/Accused, including the the Petitioner herein, pending disposal of the above Criminal Srikakulam District, as appearance of Petition. ’’IML t I '^otnsel for the Petitioner: M/s. K ARUNA \ V^ounsel for the Respondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR '' Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M. SAPTHAGIRI r 1' The Court made the following Order: St APHC010498532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8110/2024 [3396] I Between: 1.TALASU’ NAGESWARA RAO. S/O.LATE DASARATHA RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS COLONY, KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED R/O.SAI AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI. 2.BELLALA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.LATE DHARMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.GOWATHM SCHOOL STREET, KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the C.C.No.659/2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court at Palasa, Srikakulam District, as against the Petitioner/Accuse d, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.KARUNA Counsel for the Respondent/complalnant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2.M. SAPTHAGIRI • .'ii: \ ^ 2 The Court made the following; ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973^ has been filed, by the Petitioner/Accused, seeking quashment of the Proceedings against him in CC No.659 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Judicial First class Magistrate, Palasa, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 and 506 IPC. 2. Heard Ms.K.Aruna, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1/State and Sri Sapthagiri Metta, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner and respondent No.2 are residents of Palasa Kasibugga Municipality and they are living side by side houses and that the Petitioner obtained patta in 2005 by paying market value to the Government. Further, as a counter blast to the complaint given by the Petitioner, respondent No.2 created this vexatious litigation. Learned counsel would submit that except bald and omnibus allegations, no specific overt acts are attributed against him. Learned counsel restricted the prayer and requested to dispense with the presence of the Petitioner before the Trial Court on the dates of adjournments. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. . For short ‘the Code’ 7 ' 4^ ‘ 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the presence of the Petitioner/A.2 before the Trial Court, except on the specific dates as directed by the Trial Court with regard to the subject matter. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to raise the contentions at his defence before the Trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// section OFFICER To, Magistrate Court at Palasa, Srikakulam District. Kasibugga Police Station. Srikakuiann 1. The Judicial First Class 2. The Station House Officer District. . ’ . 3. OneCCto 4. Two CCS to the Public Prosecutor 5. OneCCto Sri. M. Sapthagiri, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies M/s. K Aruna, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. vna X •f k' HIGH COURT t DATED:03/09/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 8110 OF 2024 (P S It SEP 2025 P ^ . Current Section . DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION