2025:HHC:42685 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.528 of 2019 Decided on : 09.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Vijay Lakshmi .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General, for Respondents No.1 to 3-State. Respondents No.4 and 5 ex-parte. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Mr. Onkar Jairath, Learned Counsel, for the petitioner, on instructions, states that due to intervening and subsequent events, the proceedings may be given a quietus [Statement taken on record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also. 3. Accordingly, in terms of the Statement of Learned Counsel for petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:42685 stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge December 09, 2025 [Bhardwaj]