APHC010498712010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10757/2010 Between: 1. M/S. SANGAMITHRA GAS AGENCIES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR K. SIVA PRASAD S/O K. RAMA KRISHNA H.P. GAS DISTRIBUTOR R/O VAYALPADU VILLAGE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, Rep. by its Executive Director LPG Indian Area Office 3-6-436 to 438, 2nd Floor Naspur House, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in appointing new RGGLV distributors at Nimmanapalli and Gurram Konda Villages of Chittoor District vide Notification dt. 30-3-2010 is in violation of the Policy Guidelines of the respondent and the policy guidelines as approved by the Govt. of India in their Letter No. P-20020/22/2009-Mkt dt.6th August 2009 for RGGLV scheme and further declare that the said action is violative of Art 14 & 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 13763 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the appointment of new RGGLV distributors at Nimmanapalli and Gurram Konda Villages of Chittoor District vide Respondents Notification dt. 30-3-2010 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V A PADMANABHAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI The Court made the following ORDER: Sri P. Adi Seshu Babu, learned counsel, representing Sri P.V.A. Padmanabham, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 01.09.2025 KAS