NIRUJOGI JOGINAIDU v. MAREMANDA VENKATA KRISHNA KUMARI @ KRISHNA KUMARI
CRP/2708/2024 · 2025-04-04
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33283 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33283 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010498862024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 2708/2024 Between: Nirujogi Joginaidu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Maremanda Venkata Krishna Kumari Krishna Kumari
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.
KALLA GUNA SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
Sri N.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri Kalla Gunasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition is rendered infructuous and the same is also endorsed on the bundle.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 04.04.2025
siva
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2708 OF 2024
Date: 04.04.2025
siva