APHC010497872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 25604 of 2025 Between: 1. AKKINAGUNTIA SUBBARAYUDU,, S/O LATE RAMAKRISNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.K.BOYANAPALLI VILLAGE, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, RAJAMPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANNAMAYYA REVENUE DIVISION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 6. MOTHUKURI CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O.M.SESHAIAH,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O.K.BOYANAPALLI VILLAGE,RAJAMAPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent issued proceedings dated 24.07.2025 vide Appeal Order D.Dis.B3/945/2025 by Dismissed the Appeal in respect of reallocatiori of house site in favour of the petitioner father situated at Plot.No.716, to 2 an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.1119 at K.Boyanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District without following due process of law and without conducting any enquiry as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principals of natural justice and also violative of the Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India consequently set aside the same and direct the 3rd respondent to reallocation of house site in favour of the petitioner father situated at Plot.No.716, to an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.1119 at K.Boyanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District in terms of Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Order No.21. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file revision against the impugned order and he endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a revision against the order impugned in the present Writ Petition within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and, on filing such revision, the respondents are directed to entertain the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 19.09.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.25604 of 2025 Date: 19.09.2025 siva