IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20306 of 2025 Decided on: 23.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vidhyan Kumari & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sushil Kukreja Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs:- “(a) To issue Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to extend and allow the Petitioners the benefit of minimum of revised scale (ie Rs 38,100) as introduced by HP Revised Pay Rules 2022 for the contract period of service rendered by the Petitioners before regularization in the light of the decision dated 21.03.24 (Annexure P-1) of this Hon'ble court in CWP 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 8148/2022 titled as Yashwant Kumar Versus state and other connected matters and also CWP No10845/25 titled as Sunil Kumar versus state of HP annexed as Annexure P-2 which decision stands implemented by the state vide Office order dated 18th Nov 2025.” 3. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation(s) is/are so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Sushil Kukreja) December 23, 2025 Judge R.Atal