Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33267 (PAT)

Anshu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./26795/2025 · 2025-05-05

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26795 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2020 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Anshu Kumar S/o Rajesh Singh R/o Village- Ramdiri, P.S.- Matihani, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 05-05-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 11.01.2025, seeks regular bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 247 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, altogether six miscreants wearing helmets came riding on two motorcycles in front of the jewelry shop and entered the shop firing and they managed to escape after taking away 250 pairs of earrings and other articles as stated in the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons and in course of the investigation, the police got confessional statement of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26795 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 petitioner and others. No looted article has been recovered from his possession. 5. Learned counsel further submits that the looted articles have been recovered from the possession of co-accused Ramgati @ Lahra. It is submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in the case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Ramgati @ Lahra saying that he is one of his associates. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner and other accused persons have looted a huge amount of gold from a jewelry shop and their complicity has come during investigation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T