-1- B.A. No. 7640 of 2025 2025:JHHC:31220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 7640 of 2025 ---- Vikash Kumar Ravi @ Bikash Kumar Ravi, aged about 30 years son of Dhaneshwar Ram @ Dhaneshwa Ram, resident of Village Naiparam, Near Range Office Tandwa, PO and PS Tandwa, District Chatra, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mrs Sadhna Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Divyansh Krishna, Advocate ---- 3/09.10.2025 This matter has been assigned to this Bench by Hon’ble The Chief Justice and that is how, this matter has been listed today before this Bench. 2. Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State as well as the informant. 3. This application has been filed for regular bail to petitioner in connection with S.T.Case No.116 of 2025, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No.22 of 2025 for the offence under sections 80 of the BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Chatra. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is husband of the deceased and the case is registered under section 80 of the BNS, 2023. She further submits that when the incidence took place, the petitioner was not present and has gone for his daily work and as soon as he received the information about the incident, he immediately rushed to home and took the deceased to the hospital for her treatment. She also submits that the deceased after being treated in the hospital for two months of the incident, the deceased died. She next submits that the -2- B.A. No. 7640 of 2025 independent witnesses have stated that on information of the incident, the petitioner and his father immediately rushed to house and took her to the hospital, however, the deceased was partially burnt by warming herself with angithi(fire) and other family members were also sitting there being cold night. She then submits that by way of co- incidence that has occurred, and in view of that, the petitioner, who is in custody since 10.02.2025, may kindly be granted regular bail. 5. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that the petitioner is the husband. 6. Learned counsel for informant also opposes prayer and submits that incident has taken place due to torture made by the family members of the petitioner, the bail may not be granted to the petitioner. 7. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2025 and the petitioner and his father has taken the deceased to the hospital and there the deceased was treated for two months and thereafter she has left for her heavenly abode and independent witnesses have also supported the fact that the petitioner has taken the deceased to hospital and in view of that, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Chatra, in connection with S.T.Case No.116 of 2025, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No.22 of 2025. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 09th Oct., 2025 SI/