Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33266 (JHR)

PARAS MARMAT ALIAS PARAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8195/2025 · 2025-11-04

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:33037 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8195 of 2025 1. Paras Marmat @ Paras, son of Ramesh Marmat, aged about 23 years, resident of Amar Tekri, near Tejaji Mandir, P.O. & P.S.- Indore, District- Indore (M.P.) 2. Gaurav Suni @ Ashish Yadav @ Suraj @ Gaurav Panchal @ Gaurav Juni @ Gaurav, son of Sunil Juni @ Sunil Panchal, aged about 23 years, resident of 14 Indira Nagar Panchhkuiya Road, P.O. & P.S.- Malarganj, District- Indore (M.P.). 3. Nihal Salene @ Nihal, son of Prabhakar Salane, aged about 22 years, resident of 521 Lalaka Bagicha, Bhallai Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Indore, District- Indore (M.P.). …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni, Advocate ----- 3/ 04.11.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Cyber Bokaro P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 111, 318(4), 336(3), 338 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of Sri R.K. Pandey, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat. 3. The petitioners are alleged to have enticed the informant and his friends to invest money in stock market. The victims have invested Rs. 14,73,000/- through the petitioners. Thereafter, the petitioners misappropriated the said amount. 4. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the parties have settled their dispute and the petitioners have returned the entire amount to the victims. 5. Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni, learned counsel appearing for the informant has supported the aforesaid fact and submitted that the victims have received the entire amount. 6. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Pandey, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat, or his successor, in connection with Cyber Bokaro P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025. R.Kr. / 04.11.2025 (Ambuj Nath, J.)