Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010498632002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 622/2002
Between:
1. UNGATLA SURYANARAYANA, S/O.LATCHAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
2. UNGATLA APPARAO(DIED), S/O.SURYANARAYANA R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
3. UNGATLA RAMULU, S/O.SURYANARAYANA R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
4. UNGATLA GOWRU, W/O.LATE APPARAO HOUSEWIFE R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
5. UNGATLA GOPALA, S/O.LATE APPARAO MINOR R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
6. UNGATLA KANNA, S/O.LATE APPARAO MINOR R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. PENKI APPANNA, S/o.LATE VENKAYYA AGRICULTURAL LABOURER R/O.METTAVALASA VILLAGE BOBBILI MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DIST.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. C SADASIVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.622 OF 2002 J U D G M E N T:
Sri K.Sita Ram, learned counsel representing Sri Sadasiva Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that no instructions have been received from the appellants, and the appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
10.04.2025 Pmk
9
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL No.622 OF 2002
Date:10.04.2025 Pmk