IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 846 OF 2025 /; Between: 1. Jakkala Jyothi Sree, D/o J. Venkata Rao, Aged about 42 years, Occ Assistant BC Welfare Officer, Bheemunipatnam Division, Vishakapatnam Dist., R/o Flat No.215, MBP Colony, Sector 2, Vishakapatnam. 2. Kolli Prasuna, D/o Kolli Chinnaiah, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Assistant BC Welfare Officer, Nellore Urban, R/o Kondaiahpalem Gate, Nellore. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary to Government, BC Welfare (A) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Guntur District. 2. The Director of BC Welfare, A.P., Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not issuing promotion orders to the Petitioners as District one BC Welfare Officer / Executive Director BC Corporation in spite of approval of DPC vide file No.A/310/2017 dt 22.11.2024 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 AND 16 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Rules and consequently Respondents to forthwith issue promotion orders to the Petitioners as direct the District BC Welfare Officer / Executive Director BC Corporation as per the recommendations of the DPC with all service and monetary benefits. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioners for promotion to the post of District BC Welfare Officer / Executive Director BC Corporation, as per the recommendations of the DPC, considering their representations dt:18.12.2024 and 27.12.2024 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following; ORDER :€ 1 . >v APHC010015232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] 6^ FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WR>T PETITION NO: 846/2025 Between: Jakkala Jyothi Sree and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioher(S): 1.POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief; “ to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not issuing promotion orders to the Petitioners as District BC Welfare Officer / Executive Director BC Corporation in spite of approval of DPC vide file No A/310/2017 dt 22.11.2024, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 AND 16 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Rules and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith issue promotion orders to the Petitioners as District BC Welfare Officer / Executive Director BC Corporation as per the recommendations of the DPC with all service and monetary benefits and to pass....” 2 2. Heard Sri P. Amarender, learned counsel and learned Government Pleader for Services-ll appearing for the petitioner appearing for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the requested this Court, case, to issue a direction to the respondents to and 27.12.2024 respectively. respondents, on hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the dispose of the representation, dated 18.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents does not refute the said submissions. 5. In view of the submission of both the learned decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made conscious that no such direction be issued, in Court in the case of The Government of India counsels, I need not in the petition. This Court is view of the judgment of the Apex V. P.Venkatesh\ wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself no service to the cause of requested to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the and 27.12.2024 respectively, submitted by the alternative except to issue such direction. representations dated 18.12.2024 petitioner, I find no other 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to dispose of representation dated 18.12.2024 and 27.12.2024 ^ 2019 (8) SCALE 544 g!t 3 respectively, submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/- K.KASI RAO ACHARl ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECT ON OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, BC Welfare (A) Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director of BC Welfare, AP., Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. One CC to Sri Poodattu Amarender, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Services-ll, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:10/01/2025 ORDER S 2 9 JAN 2025 't WP.No.846 of 2025 ^ ^ Current Section , ^ Co DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS