Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33245 (RAJ)

MURARILAL SON OF HANUMAN SAHAI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CW/23049/2018 · 2025-03-18

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23049/2018 1. Murarilal Son Of Hanuman Sahai, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Shahpura District Jaipur. 2. Lalluram S/o Hanuman Sahai, R/o Shahpura District Jaipur. 3. Babulal S/o Hanuman Sahai, R/o Shahpura District Jaipur. 4. Rajendra S/o Madanlal, R/o Shahpura District Jaipur. 5. Mukesh S/o Madanlal, R/o Shahpura District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan State Road Development Corporation, Jhalana Dungri Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 3. Muncipal Council, Shahpura District Jaipur Through Its Commissioner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 18/03/2025 1. Petitioners have filed the present writ petition way back on 05.10.2018 seeking to restrain the respondents for illegal removal of shop of the petitioners. 2. As per office report, required PF and notices for unserved respondents No. 1 and 2 have not been filed since 08.10.2018. 3. It appears that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the writ petition. 4. In that view, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /74