Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33240 (RAJ)

RESHAM BAI MEENA W/O SHRI RAM PRASAD MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17740/2024 · 2025-01-28

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3934] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17740/2024 Resham Bai Meena W/o Shri Ram Prasad Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Vishal Dharamkanta, Jarkhoda Road, Karwar, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Khajoori, Panchayat Samiti Nainwa, District Bundi (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department (Panchayati Raj), Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Special Officer, Lokayukta Secretariat, Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Complex, Bhagwan Das Road, C Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bundi (Raj.) 4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Nainwa, Zila Parishad Bundi (Raj.) 5. Fanki Bai Meena W/o Shri Pappu Lal, R/o Khajoori, Tehsil Nanwa, District Bundi (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Pareek, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Kumar Meena Mr. Nachiketa Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 28/01/2025 Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this civil writ petition with liberty to submit a representation against the proposed enquiry in the light of the order No.461 dated 02.03.2022 issued by the State Government through the Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department. [2025:RJ-JP:3934] (2 of 2) [CW-17740/2024] The civil writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. It goes without saying that if any such representation is filed, the respondents are under an obligation to proceed in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/21