UMAR LATEEF BEIGH v. DIRECTOR SCHOOL EDUCATION JAMMU AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/1193/2025 · 2025-06-04
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3324 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3324 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 1193/2025
Umar Lateef Beigh Age 33 years S/o Ab. Latief Beigh R/o : Chareel Lamber Tehsil Banihal District Ramban …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
1. Directorate of School Education Jammu, Migrant Camp,
Muthi, Jammu – 181205 (Director Office Jammu).
2. Sub Divisional Magistrate Banihal District Ramban.
.….Respondent(s) Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (04.06.2025)
01. On the last three dates of hearing which are 16.05.2025, 20.05.2025 & 27.05.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the same is the position today also. These four non-appearances on behalf of the petitioner manifest that the petitioner is least interested in pursuing the present writ petition to its desired purpose.
02. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
04.06.2025
Bunty
Serial No. 04 Bunty Kumar 2025.06.06 08:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu