APHC010497302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25963 OF 2025 Between: 1. SAMBATURU RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/o. S. Chinna Veeraiah @ Chinna Veera Reddy, Aged about 56 years, R/o. Upparapalli Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadaya District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravthi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at Kadapa. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The SubInspector of Police 1, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District. 5. The SubInspector of Police 2, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District. 6. The Assistant SubInspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Pro Kadapa District. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 25963 OF 2025 1. SAMBATURU RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/o. S. Chinna Veeraiah @ Chinna Veera Reddy, Aged about 56 years, R/o. Upparapalli Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadaya District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravthi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at Kadapa. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR 4. The SubInspector of Police 1, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR 5. The SubInspector of Police 2, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR 6. The Assistant SubInspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. SAMBATURU RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/o. S. Chinna Veeraiah @ Chinna Veera Reddy, Aged about 56 years, R/o. Upparapalli Village, ...Petitioner . by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravthi, Guntur District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR 4. The SubInspector of Police 1, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR 5. The SubInspector of Police 2, Rural Police Station, Proddatur, YSR ddatur, YSR 7. Bobbla Chinnola Guru Devi, W/o. Sambaturi Madan Mohan Reddy, Aged about 40 years, R/o. D. No. 10/76, Gurreddi Colony, Banaganapalle Town, Nandyal District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 6 in interfering with physical and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.74 cents out of the Suit Schedule Property of Ac. 0.92 cents in OS No. 364 of 2025 out of total extent of Ac. 1.84 cents in Sy. No. 115/1 of Upparapalle Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District while pending the OS No. 364 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and runs in the defiance of principal of law laid down in D.B.C. Raj Gopal Case (reported in 2014(2) ALD (CrI) 810) and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 to 6 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in an extent of extent of Ac. 0.74 cents out of the Suit Schedule Property of Ac. 0.92 cents in OS No. 364 of 2025 out of total extent of Ac, 1.84 cents in Sy. No. 115/1 of Upparapalle Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District pending OS No. 364 of 2025 and pass such pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3 to 6 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in an extent of extent of Ac. 0.74 cents out of the Suit Schedule Property of Ac. 0.92 cents in OS No. 364 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur out of total extent of Ac. 1.84 cents in Sy. No. 115/1 of Upparapalle Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District pending OS No. 364 of 2025, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: K MADHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25963 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 6 in interfering with physical and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.74 cents out of the Suit Schedule Property of Ac. 0.92 cents in OS No. 364 of 2025 out of total extent of Ac. 1.84 cents in Sy. No. 115/1 of Upparapalle Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District while pending the OS No. 364 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and runs in the defiance of principal of law laid down in D.B.C. Raj Gopal Case (reported in 2014(2) ALD (CrI) 810) and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 to 6 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in an extent of extent of Ac. 0.74 cents out of the Suit Schedule Property of Ac. 0.92 cents in OS No. 364 of 2025 out of total extent of Ac, 1.84 cents in Sy. No. 115/1 of Upparapalle Village, Proddatur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District pending OS No. 364 of 2025 and pass such pass such..” 2. Heard Sri Sambaturu Rama Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of the official respondents. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that on the complaint lodged by the 5th respondent, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry. It is submitted that no crime has been registered against the petitioner and that the police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties. It is further stated that the petitioner was only called for enquiry in connection with the complaint and there is no intention on the part of the police to interfere with the civil disputes. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Having regard to the submissions made and in view of the fact that the dispute is purely civil in nature and O.S. No.364 of 2025 is pending before the competent Civil Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further orders are required in this Writ Petition Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents, which is already pending adjudication before the competent Civil Court and the police shall not summon or call the petitioner to the police station except in the event of registration of any cognizable offence against him by following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:24.09.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 44 W.P.No.25963 of 2025 Dt.24.09.2025 KKV