Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33233 (CHH)

VINAY SONI v. SMT SEETA SONI

CRR/776/2021 · 2025-06-22

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:27067 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 776 of 2021 Vinay Soni S/o Khedu Soni Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Sonpuri, Police Station Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Smt Seeta Soni W/o Vinay Soni Aged About 40 Years R/o Vaishnavi Vihar Uslapur , Tahsil Takhatpur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Yaman Soni S/o Vinay Soni Aged About 20 Years R/o Vaishnavi Vihar Uslapur , Tahsil Takhatpur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Muskan Soni D/o Vinay Soni Aged About 18 Years R/o Vaishnavi Vihar Uslapur , Tahsil Takhatpur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 23 .06 .2025 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision and also be pleased to set-aside the impugned order dated 09.08.2019 (Annexure A01) and order dated 01.09.2021 (Annexure A-2), in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal