Avva Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/26061/2025 · 2025-09-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33232 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33232 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010496832025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26061/2025 Between:
1. AVVA VENKATA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O ALLURU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME)
DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI BUILDINGS AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERULAPADU POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERULAPADU POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT
5. VEMIREDDY BALARAMIREDDY, S/O RAMALINGAREDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O ALLURU VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a direction or order more in particularly a writ of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by declaring the
2
action of respondent authorities in not granting the police protection to the petitioner and his property, and not registering FIR against the 5th respondent by considering my compliant dated 16.08.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Art. 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India, and consequently DIRECT the respondent authorities to register the FIR against the 5th respondent by granting police protection to the petitioner in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the respondent authorities to grant protection to the petitioner and register the FIR against the 5th respondent in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KUNTAMUKKALA SAI SREE SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26061/2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a direction or order more in particularly a writ of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by declaring the action of respondent authorities in not granting the police protection to the petitioner and his property, and not registering FIR against the 5th respondent by considering his compliant dated 16.08.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Art 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to register the FIR against the 5th respondent by granting police protection to the petitioner in the interest of justice…”
2. Heard Sri K.S.S.Sanjay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, placed on record the written instructions received in this matter regarding a case and counter case, which are pending between the petitioner and unofficial respondent. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that basing on the complaint of the petitioner, the Police have bound over the unofficial respondent in this matter.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate Court according to law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 JLV
5
45
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.26061 of 2025
Dated: 24.09.2025
JLV