Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33230 (AP)

Dugar Insulations India Private Limited, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7612/2016 · 2025-01-27

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010496342016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7612/2016 Between: Dugar Insulations India Private Limited, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. G JAGADEESWAR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “….to the issuance of an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the interference by the Respondent Nos 4 to 8 in the mining activity of the Petitioner viz i) Mine No.1 Survey No 1/1 over an extent of 151.87 acres situated at Palicherla Village, Gudur Mandal vide G.O.Ms.249 dt 28.03.1978 ii) Mine No.2 Survey No.1 over an extent of 95.72 Acres situated at Rajupalem vide G.O.No.419 dt 28.08.1980 iii) Mine No.3 Survey No.1/PA, 1/13B, 96/1, 96/3P, 96/5 P over an extent of 6.69 acres situated at Palicherla Village, Gudur Mandal, vide G.O.Ms.No 318 dt 27.06.1986 as illegal high handed and unconstitutional and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice.” 2. On an earlier occasion, i.e., on 20.01.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed on 27.01.2025 as a last chance. 3. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting this Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Dated : 27.01.2025 TM THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO W.P.No.7612 of 2016 Date: 27.01.2025 TM