- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:63 RFA No. 1965 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1965 OF 2022 (MON) BETWEEN: SMT. KAVITHA BALAJI.T AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, W/O SRI.T.A.BALAJI, RESIDING AT NO.7, G-2, S.L.V.RESIDENCY, SEETHAPATHI AGRAHARA, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VEMAREDDY.S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. PADMALATHA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, W/O LATE P.GOPI @ GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. KUM.DEEPTHI D/O LATE P.GOPI @ GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. KUM. BHAVYA D/O LATE P.GOPI @ GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.21, VENKATESHWARA NILAYAM, NO.21, 2ND 'B' CROSS, ITI LAYOUT, KATHRIGUPPE MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 085. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:63 RFA No. 1965 of 2022 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) and also before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with as of today. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the seventh time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the appeal is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The appeal is pending for almost three years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:63 RFA No. 1965 of 2022 is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 68